the existing Naval & Military land-in A other words, that if the DPW scheme
carried out the western boundary
rate west of the line any. drawn in pencil on
is
must not be at
50444
the plan in is to settle with the
the will insist
AB dra I will then remain.
whether they Admy whether
Eastern Praya commencing on.
dotted line shown.
~
An
the
plan on 50440,
9509
C originally proposed in
in
a
4405/99. Admny adopted the present shape of their sea wall,
consideration of wh.
they
will consent to line, in wh. case
-
or whether (see 19121)
an extr to Ms Chater's
the bend in their
s present sea wall will require to be
straightened out,
the further extn, before writing
to
"The privately
Dept
Michucas
As far
a1
I can see
I will consent to
on this point,
to Admy
All
I shd like
Magi Pilkingting that
Ju672
there is no
no question of low
involved here. The SofS is simply being asked to prevent from the Colonial Govt from making the proposed
reclamation is such a way
ad
6 Diminish or Deteriorate the Admiralty water-frontage. In such a matter An Admiralling claims seem to
be paramount
M. Johnson
J.J.R.12/2
JBL
Will you see some one at the Admiralty at
to this
991
hat we will consult the gaverner of the No steps will be tation without burtal communication
With them
We can write at once to the Admiralty & say
In any further communica-tion on this subject, please quote
WR.55.
and address letter to-
517/02/357
The Secretary,
Admiralty, Whitehall,
London, S.W.
Sir,
289
Admiralty, 27 January 0903.
3609
RECR
F
IPE 20 JAN ORI
I am commanded by the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty to transmit for the information of the Secretary of State for the Colonies the attached copy of a letter from the Commander in Chief of the China Station dated 31st October 1902, together with the enclosures thereto, on the subject of a proposed reclamation in front of the Eastern Praya at Hong Kong.
My Lords fully share the Commander in Chief's objections to the Colonial Government's proposals, which, in Their opinion, seriously menace Naval interests at this very important station. A very large sum of money is now being expended by the Admiralty in order to turn to the best account the restricted water frontage at the disposal of the Imperial Government, and this expenditure will be, to a large extent, rendered ineffective if the Colonial Government or any private owners are allowed to carry out these or any similar proposals.
Their Lordships therefore ask for the co-operation of the Secretary of State in resisting any interference with the Admiralty or War Office water-frontages at Hong Kong or with the access thereto or any curtailment of the water space now available for H.M. Ships.
I am to add that a similar letter has been
addressed to the War Office on the matter.
I am,
sir,
Your obedient Servant
#
Under Secretary of State,
COLONIAL OFFICE,
Whitehall, S.W.
Wan Macfecfor
2 G&S [6311] 20m 5/02
P.-No. 8.
the existing Naval & Military land-in A other words, that if the DPW scheme
carried out the western boundary
rate weat of the line any. awan im pencil on
is
must not be at
50444
the plan in in to settle with the
the will insist
AB dra I will then remain.
whether they Admy whether
Eastern Praya commencing on.
dotted line shown.
~
An
the
plan on 50440,
9509
Coriginally proposed in
in
a
4405/99. Admny adopted the present shape of their sea wall,
consideration of wh.
they
will consent to line, in wh. case
-
or whether (see 19121)
an extr to Ms Chater's
the bend in their
spresent sea wall will require to be
straightened out,
the further extn, before writing
to
"The privately
Dept
Michucas
As far
a1
I can see
I will consent to
on this point,
to Admy
All
Ishd like
Magi Pilkingting that
Ju672
there is no
no question of low
involved here. The Sofs is simply being asked to prevent from the Colonial Goost from mathing the profrosed
reclamation is such a way
ad
6 Diminish or Datarirati the Admiralty water- frontage- In such a matter An Admiralling clames seem to
be paramount
M. Johnson
J.J.R.12/2
JBL
Will you see some one at the Admiralty at
to this
991
hat we will consult the gaverner of the No stops will be tation without burtal communication
With them
We can write at once to the Admiralty & say
In any further communica- tion on this subject, please quote
WR. 55.
and address letter to-
517/02/357
The Secretary,
Admiralty, Whitehall,
London, S. W.
Sir,
289
Admiralty, 27 January 0903.
3609
RECR
F
IPE 20 JAN ORI
1 am commanded by the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty to transmit for the information of the Secretary of State for the Colonies the attached copy of a letter from the Commander in Chier of the China Station dated 31st October 1902, together with the enclosures thereto, on the subject of a proposed reclamation in front of the Bastern Praya at Hong Kong.
My Lords fully share the Commander in Chief's objections to the Colonial Covernment's proposals, which, in Their opinion, seriously menace Naval interests at this very important station. A very large sum of money is now being experded by the Admiralty in order to turn to the best account the restricted water frontage at the disposal of the Imperial Government, and this expenditure will be, to a large extent, rendered ineffective if the Colonial Government or any private owners are allowed to carry out these or any similar proposals.
Their Lordships therefore ask for the co-operat- ion of the Secretary of State in resisting any interference with the Admiralty or War Office water-frontages at Hong Kong or with the access thereto or any curtailment of the water space now available for H.M. Ships.
1 am to add that a similar letter has been
addressed to the War Office on the matter.
I am,
sir,
Your obedient Servant
#
Under Secretary of State,
COLONIAL OFFICE,
Whitehall, S.V.
Wan Macfecfor
2 G&S [6311] 20m 5/02
P.-No. 8.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.